Research theme · 4 selected briefs
These studies examine public information or voluntary adult awareness and do not require access to sensitive security operations.
Public notices and survey responses do not prove that a facility is secure or that a control prevents incidents. Avoid collecting sensitive access credentials or operational vulnerabilities.
Criminology and Security Studies · Security management
This Criminology and Security Studies final year project examines which duties are described in a sample of publicly accessible security-service procurement documents? The proposed evidence is public procurement documents sampled by date and issuer, interpreted within a clearly bounded study scope.
Read the proposed briefCriminology and Security Studies · Security management
This Criminology and Security Studies final year project examines which training topics are stated in selected public security-service guidance documents? The proposed evidence is dated authoritative guidance and a transparent topic codebook, interpreted within a clearly bounded study scope.
Read the proposed briefCriminology and Security Studies · Security management
This Criminology and Security Studies final year project examines how clearly do public notices explain visitor-check-in steps at selected facilities? The proposed evidence is permission-based notice review and fictional user tasks, interpreted within a clearly bounded study scope.
Read the proposed briefCriminology and Security Studies · Security management
This Criminology and Security Studies final year project examines which basic access-control procedures do employees recall from public or approved workplace guidance? The proposed evidence is anonymous adult survey using fictional examples and no site/security detail, interpreted within a clearly bounded study scope.
Read the proposed brief