Skip to content

Chapter One Student writing guide

How to Write a Complete Chapter One for a Research Project

Chapter One introduces a study and establishes its boundaries. There is no single heading order used by every department, so treat this as an alignment method rather than a universal template. NOUN courseware describes common components such as background, problem, objectives, significance, scope and definitions; your current handbook and supervisor determine the format you must submit.

Start with the question and the setting

Before drafting several pages of background, write a one-sentence question. Name the population, institution, system, material or body of texts, and set a practical boundary such as a period or location. The question should identify what evidence could answer it; it should not promise a result.

  1. State the broad field and the specific setting relevant to the question.
  2. Describe only context that helps a reader understand the issue.
  3. Use traceable sources for factual claims and distinguish published evidence from your own planned observation.
  4. Narrow to one researchable problem and state what remains uncertain.
  5. Check that your proposed method can obtain the evidence the question requires.

Keep background and problem distinct

The background gives a reader the context and relevant development of the issue. The problem statement makes the case for the specific uncertainty or difficulty that warrants the study. NOUN’s methodology courseware explicitly distinguishes descriptive context from the question-focused problem section; the terminology and length may differ in your department.

Hypothetical planning example

A project might ask whether a low-cost reminder prototype is usable by a small group of consenting students in one department. A defensible problem statement would cite a documented local process or a verified source, name the usability question, and explain why the proposed evaluation is bounded. It would not assert that reminders improve grades before collecting evidence.

Align questions, objectives and scope

Treat the research question as the anchor. Each specific objective should describe an observable task that contributes to answering that question; each task needs a plausible evidence source and analysis or evaluation method. Add hypotheses only when they fit the design and your programme expects them.

  • Problem: what specific issue or uncertainty is being examined?
  • Question: what answer will the study seek?
  • Objective: what will the researcher do to answer it?
  • Significance: who may use the findings, and in what limited way?
  • Scope and limitations: what is included, excluded and practically constrained?
  • Definitions: which terms need a precise, study-specific meaning?

Draft and verify in passes

  1. Confirm your department’s required headings, order, tense and citation style.
  2. Draft the problem and questions before polishing the background.
  3. Verify every local statistic and citation at its original source.
  4. Check that the significance section describes a plausible contribution, not a guaranteed impact.
  5. Check scope against time, access, ethics, budget and technical capacity.
  6. Read the chapter as a connected argument, then ask your supervisor to review the alignment.

For a proposal, some departments expect planned work to be described in future tense; a completed report may use past tense for procedures already carried out. Follow the instruction supplied for your programme rather than changing tense mechanically.

Sources and further reading

These university writing resources inform the general advice here. They do not replace your department's handbook or supervisor's guidance.

  1. NOUN FMS731 Research Methodology courseware
  2. NOUN FMS304 Research Methodology courseware